Overall EvidenceUDAANRestricted HubConnect
UDAAN · Annual Impact 2025–26

Measure developmental continuity, institutional readiness and future preparedness.

UDAAN’s annual impact layer follows institution readiness and child/young-person continuity across health, learning, life capability, career awareness and future preparedness without treating isolated activities as programme impact.

Programme Overview

What UDAAN is accountable for.

Institutional listening and readiness, approved age-responsive planning, consent/assent and safeguarding, minimum baseline, selected developmental supports, referrals, continuity, participation change/withdrawal and evidence-based governance decisions.

ListenUnderstand the CCI and existing care environment.
ReadinessPermissions, safeguards, referrals and data controls.
PlanAge-responsive institutional and individual priorities.
ImplementApproved supports within scope.
MonitorParticipation, referrals and continuity.
ReviewEvidence, limitations and unresolved needs.
DecideClose, continue, modify, replicate, scale, pause or stop.
Programme KPI

Individual annual dashboard.

Institution readiness

CCI entry, authority, safeguarding, referral, staffing and data readiness.

Participation continuity

Enrolment, assent, active participation, withdrawal, transfer or closure.

Referral / alert continuity

Open, escalated, handed over, completed or unresolved pathways.

Developmental progression

Programme-defined change across approved age-responsive domains where evidence supports interpretation.

UDAAN public annual reporting should not invent developmental outcomes where no validated baseline, follow-up or evidence source exists.
Five Interconnected Pillars

Report one developmental system, not five activity lists.

Healthy, Learning, Life, Career and Future UDAAN are lenses within one age-responsive pathway. Annual reporting should explain which priorities were activated for which age/stage groups and what continuity evidence exists.

Learning & Governance Decision

Annual evidence should drive the next programme decision.

What worked?

Identify supported improvements in access, participation, capability or institutional coordination.

What remains uncertain?

Retain missing data, negative findings, withdrawals, unresolved referrals and evidence limitations.

What next?

Use the formal governance gate before continuation, replication or scale.